[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090911141659.GA3508@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:16:59 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
chris.mason@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v20
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:42:41AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > v19 include:
> >
> > - Drop the max writeback pages patch from Ted. I think we should do
> > something to that effect, but there's really no reason to entangle
> > it with this patchset.
>
> That's reasonable, but I'd really like to know whether some VM hacker
> going to try to deal with this during the 2.6.32 window? Such as
> maybe Wu Fengguang's patches, perhaps?
>
> Or do I need to put in some kind of hack into ext4 ala what XFS did to
> work around this problem until we can come up with a longer-term fix?
I defintively want to see something in the VM, but I also agree with
Jens' decision not to include it in the patchkit. It's not really
related to the patchkit except for depending on it, and we still
have a lot of discussion going on. If we can't get an agreement with
the VM people by the end of the regular merge window I'm all for pushing
your simple patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists