[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090911145521.GA6119@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:55:25 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing: add latency format to function_graph
tracer
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:54:55AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
>
> While debugging something with the function_graph tracer, I found the
> need to see the preempt count of the traces. Unfortunately, since
> the function graph tracer has its own output formatting, it does not
> honor the latency-format option.
>
> This patch makes the function_graph tracer honor the latency-format
> option, but still keeps control of the output. But now we have the
> same details that the latency-format supplies.
>
> # tracer: function_graph
> #
> # _-----=> irqs-off
> # / _----=> need-resched
> # | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
> # || / _--=> preempt-depth
> # ||| /
> # ||||
> # CPU|||| DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
> # | |||| | | | | | |
> 3) d..1 1.333 us | idle_cpu();
> 3) d.h1 | tick_check_idle() {
> 3) d.h1 0.550 us | tick_check_oneshot_broadcast();
> 3) d.h1 | tick_nohz_stop_idle() {
> 3) d.h1 | ktime_get() {
> 3) d.h1 | ktime_get_ts() {
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Great!! Thanks a lot!
That was in my todo list :-)
Oh, BTW, what would you think about addding the current->lock_depth
in the latency format? That may help debug the bkl...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists