[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090911162804.GB17677@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:28:04 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
m.selhorst@...rix.com, jmorris@...ei.org, jbeulich@...ell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TPM: Fixup pubek sysfs file
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 02:03:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:02:24 -0700
> Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > > Algorithm: 00 00 00 01
> > > Encscheme: 00 03
> > > Sigscheme: 00 01
> > > Parameters: 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00
> > > Modulus length: 256
> >
> > No argument that this fix is an improvement, but what happened to the
> > "one value per file" rule for sysfs??
>
> We goofed. This one snuck through.
>
> It's one of the reasons why I recommend that people cite examples of
> the sysfs/procfs output in changelogs. These things are part of the
> kernel ABI and once they go in we cannot change them so we have to get
> them right first time.
Also, I try to ask for a Documentation/ABI/ update for every new sysfs
file that is added. That will show this kind of thing quite easily.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists