[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090911.114337.150207703.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: albcamus@...il.com, parag.lkml@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock_wfree() race
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:49:31 +0200
> [PATCH] net: Fix sock_wfree() race
>
> Commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80
> (net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
> opens a window in sock_wfree() where another cpu
> might free the socket we are working on.
>
> Fix is to call sk->sk_write_space(sk) only
> while still holding a reference on sk.
>
> Since doing this call is done before the
> atomic_sub(truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc), we should pass truesize as
> a bias for possible sk_wmem_alloc evaluations.
>
> Reported-by: Jike Song <albcamus@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks. I'll queue up your simpler
version for -stable.
BTW, if most if not all of the sock_writeable() calls are now
sock_writeable_bias(), it's probably better to just add the
bias argument to sock_writable().
And a quick grep shows that only a few plain sock_writeable()
calls remain in the less often used protocols.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists