[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4e36d110909111445nb6592cfue01543f5d04c2cda@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:45:01 +0200
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels
2009/9/11 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>:
>
>> And why suspend of mmc should generate card removal ??
>
> Card is powered down during suspend -> mmc can't guarantee the card is
> same and unchanged -> it makes some sense to simulate
> removal/reinsert.
But how is this going to work when I keep the device mounted and
blockdev is basically destroyed - what if I'm reading file from card
during suspend ?
>> if I suspend and resume my laptop and I keep the card inside - all
>> those step looks plain wrong.
>
> Unfortunately system can't tell.
Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume - if
some users wants to crash his card by randomly swapping it during
suspend/resume - I'd have no problem with that....
Zdenek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists