[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090911220309.GB30989@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:03:09 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: PATCH] cpuidle: A new variant of the menu governor to boost IO
performance
When you say that a bit more power was used, is that instantaneous power
draw or total power consumption over the run of the benchmark? I'd have
expected that completing it 50% faster and then going idle would be a
win overall.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists