[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909121218020.488@sister.anvils>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:21:27 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
Stefan Huber <shuber2@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...y.sbg.ac.at>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
William Irwin <wli@...ementarian.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix undefined reference to user_shm_unlock
My 353d5c30c666580347515da609dd74a2b8e9b828 "mm: fix hugetlb bug due to
user_shm_unlock call" broke the CONFIG_SYSVIPC !CONFIG_MMU build of both
2.6.31 and 2.6.30.6: "undefined reference to `user_shm_unlock'".
gcc didn't understand my comment! so couldn't figure out to optimize
away user_shm_unlock() from the error path in the hugetlb-less case,
as it does elsewhere. Help it to do so, in a language it understands.
Reported-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
---
ipc/shm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 2.6.31/ipc/shm.c 2009-09-09 23:13:59.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/ipc/shm.c 2009-09-12 11:27:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int newseg(struct ipc_namespace *
return error;
no_id:
- if (shp->mlock_user) /* shmflg & SHM_HUGETLB case */
+ if (is_file_hugepages(file) && shp->mlock_user)
user_shm_unlock(size, shp->mlock_user);
fput(file);
no_file:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists