[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090912133014.GA5858@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:30:14 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] ia32: use generic sys_pipe()
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:24:32PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Please _ALWAYS_ mention the change in behavior in the changelog,
> just in case someone ends up bisecting it. I only found out when i
> reviewed the two syscalls out of caution.
>
> The syscall you remove kept stale fd's around in case of -EFAULT
> from copy_to_user(). The generic version does an explicit close of
> those files:
>
> sys_close(fd[0]);
> sys_close(fd[1]);
> error = -EFAULT;
> The generic version looks like the better choice to me but this
> difference should be mentioned in the changelog nevertheless, just
> in case some buggy app runs into this issue.
It's not a matter of QOI, actually - sys32_pipe() is supposed to do what
sys_pipe() would do on i386 host. So any difference in handling of an
error case is simply wrong.
Whether we want those sys_close() in sys_pipe() or not is a separate
question, but we definitely want the same behaviour when 32bit process is
run natively and when it's run on amd64. So sys32_pipe() has no business
existing at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists