[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090912000742.GB12098@plap4-2.local>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:07:42 -0700
From: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Cc: Linux SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Giridhar Malavali <giridhar.malavali@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: qla2xxx: Correct compilation issues when CONFIG_MOUDLES=n
(was: Re: linux-next: Tree for September 7 (scsi/qla2x))
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 10:53 -0700, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap noted:
> >
> > when CONFIG_MODULES=n:
> >
> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2685: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> >
> > in
> > kobject_uevent_env(&(&vha->hw->pdev->driver->driver)->owner->mkobj.kobj,
> > KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
> > ---
> >
> > On Tue, 08 Sep 2009, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:02:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since 20090904:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > when CONFIG_MODULES=n:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2685: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > > >
> > > > in
> > > > kobject_uevent_env(&(&vha->hw->pdev->driver->driver)->owner->mkobj.kobj,
> > > > KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
> > >
> > > Argg... Some history here... During several unwelcome
> > > hardware/firmware events (ISP system error, mailbox command timeouts,
> > > etc), the qla2xxx driver can store a 'firmware-dump' (essentially a
> > > snapshot of the current state of the ISP firmware). This snapshot is
> > > then captured via a user-space tool querying a driver sysfs-node
> > > hanging off of a scsi_host's device tree:
> > >
> > > /sys/class/scsi_host/host4/device/fw_dump
> > >
> > > The dump is then used by our firmware engineering group to help triage
> > > the issue.
> > >
> > > This recent change:
> > >
> > > commit 10a71b40153a19279428053ad9743e15ef414148
> > > Author: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
> > > Date: Tue Aug 25 11:36:15 2009 -0700
> > >
> > > [SCSI] qla2xxx: Add firmware-dump kobject uevent notification.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Malavali <giridhar.malavali@...gic.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
> > >
> > > attempted to help 'automate' the task of retrieval by signaling udev
> > > to automatically run the 'retrieval' script anytime the driver
> > > captured the firmware-dump. Here's a snippet of the udev rule:
> > >
> > > # qla2xxx driver
> > > KERNEL=="qla2xxx", SUBSYSTEM=="module", ACTION=="change", RUN+="qla2xxx_udev.sh"
> > >
> > > Any suggestions here on an alternate driver-specific kobject an LLD
> > > can/should use for something like this? I looked previously at other
> > > callers of kobject_uevent_env(), but didn't really see a simlar
> > > usage-pattern of a driver wanting to signal events to userspace...
> > >
> > > Thanks, AV
> >
> > Ok, So any strong objections to just having the functionality present
> > when module support is enabled?
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c
> > index 29396c0..3887adb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c
> > @@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ qla2x00_post_uevent_work(struct scsi_qla_host *vha, u32 code)
> > static void
> > qla2x00_uevent_emit(struct scsi_qla_host *vha, u32 code)
> > {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > char event_string[40];
> > char *envp[] = { event_string, NULL };
> >
> > @@ -2685,6 +2686,7 @@ qla2x00_uevent_emit(struct scsi_qla_host *vha, u32 code)
> > }
> > kobject_uevent_env(&(&vha->hw->pdev->driver->driver)->owner->mkobj.kobj,
> > KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
> > +#endif
>
> Only emitting events if the thing is compiled as a module doesn't really
> look like the right solution. The first question that springs to mind
> is why are you emitting events against the module kobject in the first
> place? Why not emit them against the device kobject (which is always
> present)?
The struct device's kobj from pdev->dev?
My udev-foo is pathetic, so how exactly would that get multiplexed at
the udev side?
KERNEL=="???", SUBSYSTEM=="???", ACTION=="change", RUN+="qla2xxx_udev.sh"
Thanks, AV
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists