linux-kernel - Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:34:25 +0200
From:	Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@...glemail.com>
To:	Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@...or.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

On Samstag 12 September 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

> Seeing the "lost 1 rtc interrupts" message makes me wonder if this could
> possibly relate to problems with the C1E state on AMD systems (missing
> timer interrupts):
> 
>    http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/12/127
> 
> That thread is one year old though and your Phenom II CPU was released 7
> months later.
> 

thanks for the link!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/