[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200909140053.05779.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:53:05 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] PCI / ACPI PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up
On Monday 14 September 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:24:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > + } else if (!dev->wakeup.flags.run_wake) {
> > + acpi_set_gpe_type(dev->wakeup.gpe_device,
> > + dev->wakeup.gpe_number,
> > + ACPI_GPE_TYPE_WAKE);
>
> Is this going to work for cases where we have multiple devices attached
> to the same GPE? The common one is EHCI, where both EHCI HCDs will be
> one a single GPE. If we wake one, that'll then disable the GPE for the
> other. Further wakeup events will then be lost.
You're right, I overlooked that. Some kind of refcounting is needed here.
> > + if (device->wakeup.flags.valid)
> > + acpi_install_notify_handler(device->handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
> > + pci_acpi_device_wakeup,
> > + &dev->dev);
> > +
>
> I think this will fail for the root bridge if acpiphp has already
> grabbed it to check for hotplug events.
The root bridge is not a struct pci_dev and this is called only for these.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists