| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f7848160909130815l3e768a30n3b28808bbe5c254b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:15:30 -0400 From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com> To: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Trace event testing time - 3s to 41s Somewhere between -rc9 and yesterday's git, my desktop went from using 3s worth of trace event testing time to 41s ! It looks like we not only added a whole bunch of tracing points but also are doing the tests twice post -rc9 - the addition being testing with function tracer. grep "Testing event" dmesg.31rc9 |wc -l 100 grep "Testing event" dmesg.31git |wc -l 1172 While one could get away with "don't enable that config option then" response, for testing kernels daily this sounds like it is going to be very annoying as it adds a considerable boot lag. So I was thinking could we move this testing to a kthread with idle priority or something - may be disabling tracing until those tests are finished, if that sort of thing is necessary? Or does it need to happen synchronous to booting? Thanks Parag -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists