[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090913154744.GA27066@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:47:44 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: Epic regression in throughput since v2.6.23
* Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru> wrote:
> Note that the disabling NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS doesn't fix 3%
> regression from v2.6.23, but instead makes "make -j4" runtime
> another 2% worse (27.05 -> 27.72).
ok - thanks for the numbers, will have a look.
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> + // quick ugly hack: if a "--" appears in the command, treat is as
> + // a delimiter and use remaining part as a "cleanup command",
> + // not affecting performance counters.
> + cleanup = cleanup_argc = 0;
> + for (j = 1; j < (argc-1); j ++) {
> + if (!strcmp (argv[j], "--")) {
> + cleanup = j + 1;
> + cleanup_argc = argc - j - 1;
> + argv[j] = NULL;
> + argc = j;
> + }
> + }
Nice feature!
How about doing it a bit cleaner, as '--repeat-prepare' and
'--repeat-cleanup' options, to allow both pre-repeat and post-repeat
cleanup ops to be done outside of the measured period?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists