[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <12528585112362-git-send-email->
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:15:08 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] Kconfig help needs to say that TREE_PREEMPT_RCU scales down
To quote Valdis:
This leaves somebody who has a laptop wondering which choice
is best for a system with only one or two cores that has
CONFIG_PREEMPT defined. One choice says it scales down nicely,
the other explicitly has a 'depends on PREEMPT' attached to it...
So add "scales down nicely" to TREE_PREEMPT_RCU to match that of
TREE_RCU.
Suggested-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
init/Kconfig | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 8e8b76d..4c2c936 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -331,7 +331,8 @@ config TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
This option selects the RCU implementation that is
designed for very large SMP systems with hundreds or
thousands of CPUs, but for which real-time response
- is also required.
+ is also required. It also scales down nicely to
+ smaller systems.
endchoice
--
1.5.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists