[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1252858982.28368.171.camel@desktop>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:23:02 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] Add debug checks to TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
for premature grace periods.
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 09:15 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Check to make sure that there are no blocked tasks for the previous
> grace period while initializing for the next grace period, verify
> that rcu_preempt_qs() is given the correct CPU number and is never
> called for an offline CPU.
>
You've got a couple of whitespace issues in the WARN_ON_ONCE() lines..
As found by checkpatch,
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#97: FILE: kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:89:
+^I ^IWARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());$
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#109: FILE: kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:111:
+^I ^IWARN_ON_ONCE((rdp->grpmask & rnp->qsmaskinit) == 0);$
Could you fix these up?
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists