linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: arm tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:20:05 +0100
From:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sedji gaouaou <sedji.gaouaou@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: arm tree build failure

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 02:59:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The next-20090907 and later builds (arm at91cap9adk_defconfig) failed
> like this:
> 
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: warning: 'struct atmel_ac97_data' declared inside parameter list
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: error: conflicting types for 'at91_add_device_ac97'
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h:178: note: previous declaration of 'at91_add_device_ac97' was here
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c:367: error: variable 'cap9adk_ac97_data' has initializer but incomplete type
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c: In function 'cap9adk_board_init':
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c:397: warning: passing argument 1 of 'at91_add_device_ac97' from incompatible pointer type
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h:178: note: expected 'struct ac97c_platform_data *' but argument is of type 'struct atmel_ac97_data *'
> 
> Caused by commit d656f07a7405e788e1275d0238b67f593615f2bb ("ARM: 5640/1:
> This patch modifies the support of AC97 on the at91sam9263 ek board").

No idea.  I guess the Atmel folk have split one logical change up between
two trees, and its only been half merged.  I don't see anything in the
patch description which mentions this though.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/