[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AAE105E.1080005@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:43:58 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
CC: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: bisect results of MSI-X related panic (help!)
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>> Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
>>> I've bisected, here is my bisect log, problem is that the commit
>>> identified is a merge commit, and *I don't know what to revert to test*.
>>> It appears the parent of the merge:
>>> 6e15cf04860074ad032e88c306bea656bbdd0f22 is marked good, but looks to be
>>> in a possibly related area to the panic.
>> That merge does contain quite a few merge fixups, so it's quite possible
>> one of them is the cause of the failure.
>> Maybe the simplest way to verify that is to compile both parents of the
>> merge to doublecheck that they work OK. Then, if a compile of the merge
>> itself is bad, the problem really is in the merge commit itself.
>>
>> That commit is the "percpu" merge, so I've added Tejun (author of most of
>> that branch) and Ingo (merger) in CC.
>
> Sorry, the oops doesn't ring a bell, well, not yet at least. It would
> be great if the bisection can be narrowed down more.
Also, building w/ debug option on, capturing more oops traces and
pasting gdb output of l *<oops address> might shed some more light.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists