[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AAE3F86.8090804@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:05:10 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <teheo@...e.de>
To: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
Cc: Chris Webb <chris@...chsys.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Andrei Tanas <andrei@...as.ca>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>, Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: MD/RAID time out writing superblock
Mark Lord wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> ..
>> Oooh, another possibility is the above continuous IDENTIFY tries.
>> Doing things like that generally isn't a good idea because vendors
>> don't expect IDENTIFY to be mixed regularly with normal IOs and
>> firmwares aren't tested against that. Even smart commands sometimes
>> cause problems. So, finding out the thing which is obsessed with the
>> identity of the drive and stopping it might help.
> ..
>
> Bullpucky. That sort of thing, specifically with IDENTIFY,
> has never been an issue.
With SMART it has. I wouldn't be too surprised if some new firmware
chokes on repeated IDENTIFY mixed with stream of NCQ commands. It's
just not something people (including vendors) do regularly.
> I wonder if the IDENTIFY is actually coming from libata EH
> after something else failed ?
In that case, libata-eh would print "ataP.DD: failed to IDENTIFY
(blah, err_mask=0x%x\n" instead of the full TF dump.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists