linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] input/keyboard: new OpenCores Keyboard Controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200909141049.50705.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:49:50 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Javier Herrero <jherrero@...istemas.es>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] input/keyboard: new OpenCores Keyboard Controller driver

Hi Mike,

On Monday 14 September 2009 10:40:03 am Mike Frysinger wrote:
> +
> +struct opencores_kbd {
> +	struct input_dev *input;
> +	struct resource *addr_res;
> +	struct resource *irq_res;
> +	unsigned short *keycode;
> +};

Why do we allocate keycode table separately form the main structure?

I think I still have some reservations with the notion that we can just
have exact "scancode" - KEY_* mapping and hardware producers will adjust
the hardware to follow the deriver but I guess it's OK...


-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/