[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909141403390.5676@V090114053VZO-1>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:04:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Krauss, Assaf" <assaf.krauss@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"Abbas, Mohamed" <mohamed.abbas@...el.com>
Subject: Re: iwlagn: order 2 page allocation failures
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> The allocation of buffers >= PAGE_SIZE even when allocated with
> kmalloc() are page-aligned though right? It's not an explicit guarantee
> but is it not always the case?
Its typically the case but debug options may misalign the object. The
guarantee for kmalloc caches is to be cacheline aligned.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists