[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090914043444.GA18590@localhost>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:34:44 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"avi@...ranet.com" <avi@...ranet.com>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Mike Smith <scgtrp@...il.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devmem: handle partial kmem write/read
Hi Kame,
This patch needs more work. I first intent to fix a bug:
sz = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
p += sz;
}
So if the returned len is 0, the kbuf/p pointers will mismatch.
Then I realize it changed the write behavior. The current vwrite()
behavior is strange, it returns 0 if _whole range_ is hole, otherwise
ignores the hole silently. So holes can be treated differently even in
the original code.
I'm not really sure about the right behavior. KAME-san, do you have
any suggestions?
Thanks,
Fengguang
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:29:01AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Current vwrite silently ignores vwrite() to vmap holes.
> Better behavior should be stop the write and return
> on such holes.
>
> Also return on partial read, which may happen in future
> (eg. hit hwpoison pages).
>
> CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/mem.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-mm.orig/drivers/char/mem.c 2009-09-14 10:59:50.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-mm/drivers/char/mem.c 2009-09-14 11:06:25.000000000 +0800
> @@ -444,18 +444,22 @@ static ssize_t read_kmem(struct file *fi
> if (!kbuf)
> return -ENOMEM;
> while (count > 0) {
> + unsigned long n;
> +
> sz = size_inside_page(p, count);
> - sz = vread(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> - if (!sz)
> + n = vread(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> + if (!n)
> break;
> - if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, sz)) {
> + if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, n)) {
> free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> - count -= sz;
> - buf += sz;
> - read += sz;
> - p += sz;
> + count -= n;
> + buf += n;
> + read += n;
> + p += n;
> + if (n < sz)
> + break;
> }
> free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> }
> @@ -551,11 +555,13 @@ static ssize_t write_kmem(struct file *
> free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> - sz = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> - count -= sz;
> - buf += sz;
> - virtr += sz;
> - p += sz;
> + n = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> + count -= n;
> + buf += n;
> + virtr += n;
> + p += n;
> + if (n < sz)
> + break;
> }
> free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists