linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Disable partition scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <912126502@web.de>
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:59:50 +0200
From:	devzero@....de
To:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable partition scan

> But more importantly the commandline will be a killer. You would have to specify the device
> to be excluded prior to driver probing. Which means you'd have to know how the driver would
> enumerate the device and how the device to be excluded would be named.
> But exactly this isn't guaranteed, so it'll be virtually impossible to do so.

ok, you`re right

>PS.: One wonders what'll happen to the patch. Maybe it'll linger forever in bugzilla as no-one
>feels it important enough to have a look at it, let alone merge ...
>So, if there are any users out there, please speak up to have it merged!

you did that patch for a reason (customer request?) and we have another request for it in bugzilla.
i think it`s useful.

maybe adding the new param to kernel-params.txt and adding some more people cc below the 
signed-off will raise chances for acceptance.


> devzero@....de wrote:
> > Hello, 
> > 
> > iirc i had a setup a while ago where i also found disabling partition scanning would be nice to have.
> > 
> > actually, we have a bugzilla entry for this - have a look at:
> > 
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8588
> > 
> > anyway, wouldn`t it be better to disable that on a per device basis or at least be able to exclude 
> > the boot/system devices from being skipped? 
> > 
> Hmm. Not sure about this.
> For once, you'd have to have a tool like kpartx anyway to generate the partition mappings for the
> not-excluded devices. Hence it's not a big deal to use this tool _always_, ie for all devices.
> 
> But more importantly the commandline will be a killer. You would have to specify the device
> to be excluded prior to driver probing. Which means you'd have to know how the driver would
> enumerate the device and how the device to be excluded would be named.
> But exactly this isn't guaranteed, so it'll be virtually impossible to do so.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hannes
> PS.: One wonders what'll happen to the patch. Maybe it'll linger forever in bugzilla as no-one
> feels it important enough to have a look at it, let alone merge ...
> So, if there are any users out there, please speak up to have it merged!
> -- 
> Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
> hare@...e.de			      +49 911 74053 688
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> 


________________________________________________________________
Neu: WEB.DE Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate
für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://produkte.web.de/go/02/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/