[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090914213933.GA5468@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:39:33 +0200
From: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@...dio.unibo.it>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: V4L2 drivers: potentially dangerous and inefficient
msecs_to_jiffies() calculation
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:34:40PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 09/14/2009 11:07 PM, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > ./drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c
> > do
> > cam->module_param.frame_timeout *
> > 1000 * msecs_to_jiffies(1) );
> > multiple times each.
> > What they should do instead is
> > frame_timeout * msecs_to_jiffies(1000), I'd think.
>
> In fact, msecs_to_jiffies(frame_timeout * 1000) makes much more sense.
Heh, right, even a bit better ;)
> > msecs_to_jiffies(1) is quite a bit too boldly assuming
> > that all of the msecs_to_jiffies(x) implementation branches
> > always round up.
>
> They do, don't they?
I'd hope so, but a slight risk remains, you never know,
especially with 4+ or so variants...
Andreas Mohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists