[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AADA1F9.9080305@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:52:57 +0800
From: Danny Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
CC: cl@...ux-foundation.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [GIT BISECT] BUG kmalloc-8192: Object already free from kmem_cache_destroy
On 09/14/2009 07:11 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 14:33 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>> 2a38a002fbee06556489091c30b04746222167e4 is first bad commit
>> commit 2a38a002fbee06556489091c30b04746222167e4
>> Author: Xiaotian Feng<dfeng@...hat.com>
>> Date: Wed Jul 22 17:03:57 2009 +0800
>>
>> slub: sysfs_slab_remove should free kmem_cache when debug is enabled
>>
>> kmem_cache_destroy use sysfs_slab_remove to release the kmem_cache,
>> but when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is enabled, sysfs_slab_remove just release
>> related kobject, the whole kmem_cache is missed to release and cause
>> a memory leak.
>>
>> Acked-by: Christoph Lameer<cl@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng<dfeng@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg<penberg@...helsinki.fi>
>>
>> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y
>> CONFIG_SLUB=y
>> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y
>> # CONFIG_SLUB_STATS is not set
>
> I also had problems destroying a kmem_cache in a security_initcall()
> function which had a different backtrace (it's what made me create the
> module and bisect.) So be sure to let me know what you find so I can
> be sure that we fix that place as well (I believe that was a kref
> problem rather than a double free)
>
> -Eric
>
>
Could you please tell me the tree you're using? I'll debug on it first...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists