[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1252910133.5934.3.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:35:33 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 15:52 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:40:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h between commit
> > 249acdd3fd13d1ec579ff9b1c5273cf5515cd352 ("SLQB slab allocator (try 2)")
> > from the slab tree and commit 03b042bf1dc14a268a3d65d38b4ec2a4261e8477
> > ("rcu: Add synchronize_sched_expedited() primitive") from the tip tree.
> >
> > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
>
> This conflict is now between the slab tree and Linus' tree.
OK, thanks Stephen, I'll fix it up in my tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists