[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090914001136.f1fd580a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:11:36 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@...rix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TPM: Fixup pcrs sysfs file
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:25:20 -0600 Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:36:39PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> > > > That sounds like a fairly serious bug, and this looks like a 2.6.31
> > > > patch.
> >
> > Any comments from the maintainers on this patch?
>
> FWIW, I didn't mention in the patch emails, but all the patches I sent
> fix regressions that have been introduced in the past couple years by
> clean up patches that never tested the code paths they alter.
>
> What becomes of patches that end up in the mm tree? Do they still
> route through you for mainline inclusion?
I'll be sending tpm patches to James henceforth. I presently have
tpm-fixup-pcrs-sysfs-file.patch
tpm-fixup-pcrs-sysfs-file-update.patch
tpm-fix-up-pubek-sysfs-file.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists