[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090915075100.GB23126@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:51:00 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Thomas Liu <tliu@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [origin tree SLAB corruption #2] BUG kmalloc-64: Poison
overwritten, INFO: Allocated in bdi_alloc_work+0x2b/0x100 age=175
cpu=1 pid=3514
On Tue, Sep 15 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> > > trying to pull in:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git writeback
> > >
> > > and see if it reproduces there? That path has been cleaned up
> > > considerably there.
> >
> > I gave it a test-pull - and the bug does not trigger anymore.
> >
> > Note, that may not mean much: your tree is based on a fresh upstream
> > tree so it pulled a lot of new stuff into -tip that i have yet to
> > test/validate. It also changed the kernel image size/layout
> > considerably and this bug seems to be a very narrow to hit race of
> > sorts.
>
> Btw., is there anything in your cleanups that could explain this bug?
> Some list handling bug? A double free? Uninitialized memory? Race
> between block IRQs and process context?
No that that I noticed, it was just a thought since that path has been
cleaned up and I have been looking at the newer tree only. I'll take a
good look at the current -git situation.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists