[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090915082200.GA2588@localhost>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:22:00 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] /proc/kmem cleanups and hwpoison bits
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:09:39AM +0800, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:18:51 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Kame,
> >
> > Here are 3 more kmem patches in my queue. Comments are welcome.
> > If you feel good about them, I can send all recent kmem cleanup
> > patches for you.
> >
>
> This is my quick hack. But I don't want to be an obstacle for you.
> So, I'll wait for your updates.
Thanks. This is also a bug fix: vmalloc_to_page() will otherwise BUG()
on !is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() pages.
> ==
> Now, /dev/kmem's read/write vmalloc area doesn't do
> range-check. Because vread/vwrite traverse vmalloc area list
> under system-wide spinlock, it's better to avoid unnecessary
> to do unnecessary calls to vread/vwrite.
is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() could be put to either read_kmem()
or aligned_vread(), and I'm fine with both.
It looks like vread can be shared by kmem and kcore :)
> And, vread/vwrite returns 0 if we accessed memory holes.
> We can avoid copy-to-user in read side, we just ignore at write.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/mem.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.31/drivers/char/mem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31.orig/drivers/char/mem.c
> +++ linux-2.6.31/drivers/char/mem.c
> @@ -437,17 +437,19 @@ static ssize_t read_kmem(struct file *fi
> }
>
> if (count > 0) {
> - kbuf = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + kbuf = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> if (!kbuf)
> return -ENOMEM;
> while (count > 0) {
> sz = size_inside_page(p, count);
> - sz = vread(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> - if (!sz)
> - break;
> - if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, sz)) {
> - free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> - return -EFAULT;
> + if (is_vmalloc_or_module_addr((void*)p)) {
> + /* returns Non-zero if a page is found */
> + if (vread(kbuf, (char *)p, sz))
> + if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, sz)) {
> + free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + }
> }
> count -= sz;
> buf += sz;
> @@ -541,6 +543,11 @@ static ssize_t write_kmem(struct file *
> unsigned long sz = size_inside_page(p, count);
> unsigned long n;
>
> + if (is_vmalloc_or_module_addr((void*)p)) {
!is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() ?
> + free_page((unsignedl long)kbuf);
> + retrun -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> n = copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, sz);
> if (n) {
> if (wrote + virtr)
> @@ -548,7 +555,11 @@ static ssize_t write_kmem(struct file *
> free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> - sz = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> + /*
> + * returns non-zero if copied successfully....
> + * But we don't care it. just make a progress.
> + */
> + vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
vwrite could return error code which should not be ignored.
Thanks,
Fengguang
> count -= sz;
> buf += sz;
> virtr += sz;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists