[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090915103739.GA19519@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:37:39 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S
> >> > Because then you get it whenever you configure for V4 as the lowest
> >> > denominator CPU, which leads to the buggy behaviour on better CPUs.
> >> > It's far better to leave it as is and just accept that the old CPUs
> >> > will have longer than necessary delays. If people really really
> >> > care (and there's likely to only be a small minority of them now)
> >> > changing the '0' to a '1' is a very simple change for them to carry
> >> > in their local tree. Unlike getting the right unrolling etc.
> >>
> >> Well, they can also 'git revert' this patch. If somebody really cares
> >> I think they should shout now and provide a better patch, otherwise
> >> this one should be merged.
> >
> > On the other hand, having the code there as it currently stands is not
> > harmful in any way, so leaving it there is just as easy.
>
> It makes the code less understandable. I'm not sure about linux's
> practices, but an #if 0 generally means somebody is being lazy.
Not in this case, as you was explained to you. You may want to add
explaining comment above #if 0....
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists