| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20090915113113.126f90f0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:31:13 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"avi@...ranet.com" <avi@...ranet.com>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Mike Smith <scgtrp@...il.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devmem: handle partial kmem write/read
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:02:08 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:24:48AM +0800, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:34:44 +0800
> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kame,
> > >
> > > This patch needs more work. I first intent to fix a bug:
> > >
> > > sz = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > > p += sz;
> > > }
> > >
> > > So if the returned len is 0, the kbuf/p pointers will mismatch.
> > >
> > > Then I realize it changed the write behavior. The current vwrite()
> > > behavior is strange, it returns 0 if _whole range_ is hole, otherwise
> > > ignores the hole silently. So holes can be treated differently even in
> > > the original code.
> > >
> > Ah, ok...
> >
> > > I'm not really sure about the right behavior. KAME-san, do you have
> > > any suggestions?
> > >
> > maybe following make sense.
> > =
> > written = vwrite(kbuf, (char *p), sz);
> > if (!written) // whole vmem was a hole
> > written = sz;
>
> Since the 0 return value won't be used at all, it would be simpler to
> tell vwrite() return the untouched buflen/sz, like this. It will ignore
> _all_ the holes silently. Need to update comments too.
>
Hmm. IIUC the original kmem code returns immediately if vread/vwrite returns 0.
But it seems this depends on wrong assumption that vmap area is continuous,
at the first look.
In man(4) mem,kmem
==
Byte addresses in mem are interpreted as physical memory addresses.
References to nonexistent locations cause errors to be returned.
.....
The file kmem is the same as mem, except that the kernel virtual memory
rather than physical memory is accessed.
==
Then, we have to return error for accesses to "nonexistent locations".
memory-hole in vmap area is ....."nonexistent" ?
I think it's nonexistent if there are no overlaps between requested [pos, pos+len)
and registerred vmalloc area.
But, hmm, there are no way for users to know "existing vmalloc area".
Then, my above idea may be wrong.
Then, I'd like to modify as following,
- If is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(requested address) is false, return -EFAULT.
- If is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(requested address) is true, return no error.
Even if specified range doesn't include no exsiting vmalloc area.
How do you think ?
Thanks,
-Kame
p.s. I wonder current /dev/kmem cannot read text area of kernel if it's not
directly mapped.
> --- linux-mm.orig/mm/vmalloc.c 2009-09-15 09:40:08.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-mm/mm/vmalloc.c 2009-09-15 09:43:33.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1834,7 +1834,6 @@ long vwrite(char *buf, char *addr, unsig
> struct vm_struct *tmp;
> char *vaddr;
> unsigned long n, buflen;
> - int copied = 0;
>
> /* Don't allow overflow */
> if ((unsigned long) addr + count < count)
> @@ -1858,7 +1857,6 @@ long vwrite(char *buf, char *addr, unsig
> n = count;
> if (!(tmp->flags & VM_IOREMAP)) {
> aligned_vwrite(buf, addr, n);
> - copied++;
> }
> buf += n;
> addr += n;
> @@ -1866,8 +1864,6 @@ long vwrite(char *buf, char *addr, unsig
> }
> finished:
> read_unlock(&vmlist_lock);
> - if (!copied)
> - return 0;
> return buflen;
> }
>
> > ==
> > needs fix.
> >
> > Anyway, I wonder kmem is broken. It's should be totally rewritten.
> >
> > For example, this doesn't check anything.
> > ==
> > if (p < (unsigned long) high_memory) {
> >
> > ==
> >
> > But....are there users ?
> > If necessary, I'll write some...
>
> I'm trying to stop possible mem/kmem users to access hwpoison pages..
> I'm not the user, but rather a tester ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
> > Thanks,
> > -Kame
> >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Fengguang
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:29:01AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > Current vwrite silently ignores vwrite() to vmap holes.
> > > > Better behavior should be stop the write and return
> > > > on such holes.
> > > >
> > > > Also return on partial read, which may happen in future
> > > > (eg. hit hwpoison pages).
> > > >
> > > > CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/char/mem.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --- linux-mm.orig/drivers/char/mem.c 2009-09-14 10:59:50.000000000 +0800
> > > > +++ linux-mm/drivers/char/mem.c 2009-09-14 11:06:25.000000000 +0800
> > > > @@ -444,18 +444,22 @@ static ssize_t read_kmem(struct file *fi
> > > > if (!kbuf)
> > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > > while (count > 0) {
> > > > + unsigned long n;
> > > > +
> > > > sz = size_inside_page(p, count);
> > > > - sz = vread(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > > > - if (!sz)
> > > > + n = vread(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > > > + if (!n)
> > > > break;
> > > > - if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, sz)) {
> > > > + if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, n)) {
> > > > free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> > > > return -EFAULT;
> > > > }
> > > > - count -= sz;
> > > > - buf += sz;
> > > > - read += sz;
> > > > - p += sz;
> > > > + count -= n;
> > > > + buf += n;
> > > > + read += n;
> > > > + p += n;
> > > > + if (n < sz)
> > > > + break;
> > > > }
> > > > free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -551,11 +555,13 @@ static ssize_t write_kmem(struct file *
> > > > free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> > > > return -EFAULT;
> > > > }
> > > > - sz = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > > > - count -= sz;
> > > > - buf += sz;
> > > > - virtr += sz;
> > > > - p += sz;
> > > > + n = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > > > + count -= n;
> > > > + buf += n;
> > > > + virtr += n;
> > > > + p += n;
> > > > + if (n < sz)
> > > > + break;
> > > > }
> > > > free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> > > > }
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists