[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090915192930.GQ23126@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:29:30 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: npiggin@...e.de
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] fs: fix bdi writeback use after free 2
On Wed, Sep 16 2009, npiggin@...e.de wrote:
> work can be gone after wb_clear_pending, so load the sb from it first.
This one is already moot, I fixed that in an earlier patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writebac
>
> while ((work = get_next_work_item(bdi, wb)) != NULL) {
> enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode;
> + struct super_block *sb;
>
> nr_pages = work->nr_pages;
>
> @@ -794,6 +795,8 @@ long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writebac
> else
> sync_mode = work->sync_mode;
>
> + sb = work->sb;
> +
> /*
> * If this isn't a data integrity operation, just notify
> * that we have seen this work and we are now starting it.
> @@ -801,7 +804,7 @@ long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writebac
> if (sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> wb_clear_pending(wb, work);
>
> - wrote += wb_writeback(wb, nr_pages, work->sb, sync_mode, 0);
> + wrote += wb_writeback(wb, nr_pages, sb, sync_mode, 0);
>
> /*
> * This is a data integrity writeback, so only do the
>
>
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists