[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909152111330.22199@sister.anvils>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:15:07 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: reinstate ZERO_PAGE
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:56:57 +0100 (BST)
> Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Though I like that we don't _need_ to change mlock.c for reinstated
> > ZERO_PAGE, this morning I'm having trouble persuading myself that
> > mlocking a readonly anonymous area is too silly to optimize for.
> >
> > Maybe the very people who persuaded you to bring back the anonymous
> > use of ZERO_PAGE, are also doing a huge mlock of the area first?
> No, as far as I know, they'll not do huge mlock.
Thanks for that (not entirely conclusive!) info.
I've decided for the moment to make a couple of further optimizations
in mlock.c (along with the comment you asked for), and leave adding
another __get_user_pages flag until a case for it is demonstrated.
Small patch series following shortly.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists