[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253053609.3273.139.camel@linux-1lbu>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:26:49 -0500
From: Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 23:04 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com> writes:
>
> > +config OLD_CPU_DELAY
> > + depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T
> > + bool "Accurate delays"
> > + def_bool n
> > + help
> > + Enable if observing longer than expected delays and need more
> > + accuracy. This only applies to older CPUs.
> > +
>
> If it's that simple then why not enable the extra delay code
> unconditionally when compiling for those CPUs?
>
> We don't need "do something better" options.
If I know for sure that these are the processors that need that block of
code, your suggestion makes perfect sense. Unfortunately, I don't know.
My primary goals are
1. Put a stop to this thread (so far I have failed miserably)
2. Document that block of code.
3. If it makes someone's life easier.. it would be a bonus.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists