lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:26:49 -0500
From:	Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S

On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 23:04 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com> writes:
> 
> > +config OLD_CPU_DELAY
> > +	depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T
> > +	bool "Accurate delays"
> > +	def_bool n
> > +	help
> > +	  Enable if observing longer than expected delays and need more
> > +	  accuracy.  This only applies to older CPUs.
> > +
> 
> If it's that simple then why not enable the extra delay code
> unconditionally when compiling for those CPUs?
> 
> We don't need "do something better" options.

If I know for sure that these are the processors that need that block of
code, your suggestion makes perfect sense.  Unfortunately, I don't know.
My primary goals are

1.  Put a stop to this thread (so far I have failed miserably)
2.  Document that block of code.
3.  If it makes someone's life easier.. it would be a bonus.

Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ