[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090915183405.2797b05e@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:34:05 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, samba@...ts.samba.org,
linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:10:47 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > In any case, I think we need to look closely at what's happening at
> > mount time. First, I'll need some other info:
> >
> > 1) output of "/sbin/mount.cifs -V" from both machines
>
> The 32 bit machine
>
> #/sbin/mount.cifs -V
> mount.cifs version: 1.5
> //chiprodfs2/company /mnt -ouser=clameter,domain=xxx
> mount -t cifs //chiprodfs2/company /mnt -ouser=clameter,domain=xxx
>
Yow, that version of mount.cifs is really old. I wonder if it may be
passing bad mount options to the kernel? Might be interesting to strace
that. Something like:
# strace -f -s 256 -e mount mount -t cifs //chiprodfs2/company /mnt -ouser=clameter,domain=xxx
...it'll probably have a cleartext password in it so you might want to
doctor the options a bit before sending along if you do.
Alternately, you might just want to try a newer version of mount.cifs
and see whether that fixes this.
> 64 bit machine
>
> $ /sbin/mount.cifs -V
> mount.cifs version: 1.12-3.4.0
>
> mount -t cifs //chiprodfs2/company /mnt -ouser=clameter,domain=w2k
>
> > 3) wire captures from mount attempts on both machines. Try to mount the
> > "clameter" dir on both boxes and do captures of each attempt. Maybe
> > this time use -s 0 with tcpdump so we get all of the traffic.
>
> I cannot mount the clameter dir on the 32 bit box. Hangs. So I will mount
> /company.
>
Actually, the trace of a hanging mount would probably be interesting.
Does the 32-bit capture that you sent represent a mount attempt that
hung? Or was it successful?
> > There may be crackable password hashes in the captures, so you may want
> > to send them to me privately and not cc the list.
>
> Ok will follow.
>
Thanks for the info, I had a look at the captures. They both look
fairly similar. The main difference is that the 32-bit box doesn't seem
to have sent any more calls after sending a QPathInfo call to the
server for the root inode of the mount.
What's the "devname" that you're giving to the mount command for the
"clameter" dir? If there's more than 1 path component after the
hostname, then the problem may be in the old version of mount.cifs.
Some of them had broken handling for path prefixes.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists