[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20909151607h5171784ence5e6722adab4ad7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:07:05 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Sosnowski, Maciej" <maciej.sosnowski@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/29] ioat2,3: dynamically resize descriptor ring
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Sosnowski, Maciej
<maciej.sosnowski@...el.com> wrote:
> Making the max_alloc_order a module parameter gives impression
> that it can be modified by an user, including making it larger than default.
> The default is however its maximum value, which may be confusing.
> Why not to use parameter only as the upper limit?
It is the upper limit.
The user can limit the upper size of the descriptor ring by setting
this to a value less than 16. By default it is the maximum ring size
that the driver/hardware* supports. Specifying values greater than 16
are not supported by the so we need enforce a ceiling at 16.
--
Dan
* We could support ring sizes larger than 1 << 16 but we would need to
extra logic to ensure that the pending count never exceeded 1 << 16.
Simpler I think to just limit the maximum ring size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists