[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090916080404.GC4870@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:04:04 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
npiggin@...e.de, sachinp@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLQB: Mark the allocator as broken PowerPC and S390
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:01:08AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > The SLQB allocator is known to be broken on certain PowerPC and S390
> > > configurations. Disable the allocator in Kconfig for those architectures
> > > until the issues are resolved.
Looks ok to me. I'll debug s390 when time permits.
> > > init/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > > index c0d8a47..aaeddeb 100644
> > > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > > @@ -1033,6 +1033,7 @@ config SLUB
> > >
> > > config SLQB
> > > bool "SLQB (Queued allocator)"
> > > + depends on !PPC && !S390
> > > help
> > > SLQB is a proposed new slab allocator.
> > >
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 23:55 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > I think this should be (!PPC && !S390) || EXPERIMENTAL so that it can
> > still be enabled for debugging and development.
>
> Everybody enables EXPERIMENTAL so that seems pointless. Developers can
> hack Kconfig locally, no?
Exactly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists