linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3] crypto: Add PCLMULQDQ accelerated GHASH implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1253064032.15717.369.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:20:32 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] crypto: Add PCLMULQDQ accelerated GHASH
 implementation

On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 22:42 +0800, Daniel Walker wrote: 
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:42 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > Hi, Herbert,
> > 
> > The dependency to irq_fpu_usable has been merged by linus' tree.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Huang Ying
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------->
> > PCLMULQDQ is used to accelerate the most time-consuming part of GHASH,
> > carry-less multiplication. More information about PCLMULQDQ can be
> > found at:
> > 
> > http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/carry-less-multiplication-and-its-usage-for-computing-the-gcm-mode/
> > 
> > Because PCLMULQDQ changes XMM state, its usage must be enclosed with
> > kernel_fpu_begin/end, which can be used only in process context, the
> > acceleration is implemented as crypto_ahash. That is, request in soft
> > IRQ context will be defered to the cryptd kernel thread.
> > 
> > v3:
> >  - Revise GHASH implementation, performance increase about 2x.
> 
> 
> You have three style issues in this patch, for instance you shouldn't
> set values inside if() statements .. If you run checkpatch on this it
> will tell you all the style problems. Could you run this through
> checkpatch and fix any errors it's find ?

Thanks, I will fix them.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/