[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090916121620.GD26030@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:16:20 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
chris.mason@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org, tytso@....edu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz, trond.myklebust@....uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] Assign bdi in super_block
On Tue 15-09-09 20:16:51, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We do this automatically in get_sb_bdev() from the set_bdev_super()
> callback. Filesystems that have their own private backing_dev_info
> must assign that in ->fill_super().
>
> Note that ->s_bdi assignment is required for proper writeback!
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 +
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 ++
> fs/super.c | 6 ++++++
> fs/sync.c | 9 ++++++++-
> fs/ubifs/super.c | 1 +
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
I think we agreed that NFS needs to assign it's private BDI to sb->s_bdi,
didn't we? From Tronds comment, that should be enough.
Honza
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 15831d5..8b81927 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -1600,6 +1600,7 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
>
> sb->s_blocksize = 4096;
> sb->s_blocksize_bits = blksize_bits(4096);
> + sb->s_bdi = &fs_info->bdi;
>
> /*
> * we set the i_size on the btree inode to the max possible int.
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index 4567db6..e5dbecd 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ static int fuse_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> if (err)
> goto err_put_conn;
>
> + sb->s_bdi = &fc->bdi;
> +
> /* Handle umasking inside the fuse code */
> if (sb->s_flags & MS_POSIXACL)
> fc->dont_mask = 1;
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index 9cda337..b03fea8 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -707,6 +707,12 @@ static int set_bdev_super(struct super_block *s, void *data)
> {
> s->s_bdev = data;
> s->s_dev = s->s_bdev->bd_dev;
> +
> + /*
> + * We set the bdi here to the queue backing, file systems can
> + * overwrite this in ->fill_super()
> + */
> + s->s_bdi = &bdev_get_queue(s->s_bdev)->backing_dev_info;
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/sync.c b/fs/sync.c
> index 1923409..c08467a 100644
> --- a/fs/sync.c
> +++ b/fs/sync.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,13 @@
> */
> static int __sync_filesystem(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> {
> + /*
> + * This should be safe, as we require bdi backing to actually
> + * write out data in the first place
> + */
> + if (!sb->s_bdi)
> + return 0;
> +
> /* Avoid doing twice syncing and cache pruning for quota sync */
> if (!wait) {
> writeout_quota_sb(sb, -1);
> @@ -101,7 +108,7 @@ restart:
> spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
>
> down_read(&sb->s_umount);
> - if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) && sb->s_root)
> + if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) && sb->s_root && sb->s_bdi)
> __sync_filesystem(sb, wait);
> up_read(&sb->s_umount);
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
> index 51763aa..c4af069 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
> @@ -1980,6 +1980,7 @@ static int ubifs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> if (err)
> goto out_bdi;
>
> + sb->s_bdi = &c->bdi;
> sb->s_fs_info = c;
> sb->s_magic = UBIFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
> sb->s_blocksize = UBIFS_BLOCK_SIZE;
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index db29588..90162fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1342,6 +1342,7 @@ struct super_block {
> int s_nr_dentry_unused; /* # of dentry on lru */
>
> struct block_device *s_bdev;
> + struct backing_dev_info *s_bdi;
> struct mtd_info *s_mtd;
> struct list_head s_instances;
> struct quota_info s_dquot; /* Diskquota specific options */
> --
> 1.6.4.1.207.g68ea
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists