lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090916133220.GJ26030@duck.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:32:20 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	chris.mason@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org, tytso@....edu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz, trond.myklebust@....uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] writeback: make wb_writeback() take an argument
	structure

On Wed 16-09-09 15:24:42, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We need to be able to pass in range_cyclic as well, so instead
> of growing yet another argument, split the arguments into a
> struct wb_writeback_args structure that we can use internally.
> Also makes it easier to just copy all members to an on-stack
> struct, since we can't access work after clearing the pending
> bit.
  Looks good.
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

								Honza

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c |   78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 783ed44..c5e9122 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,17 @@
>  int nr_pdflush_threads;
>  
>  /*
> + * Passed into wb_writeback(), essentially a subset of writeback_control
> + */
> +struct wb_writeback_args {
> +	long nr_pages;
> +	struct super_block *sb;
> +	enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode;
> +	int for_kupdate;
> +	int range_cyclic;
> +};
> +
> +/*
>   * Work items for the bdi_writeback threads
>   */
>  struct bdi_work {
> @@ -45,9 +56,7 @@ struct bdi_work {
>  	unsigned long seen;
>  	atomic_t pending;
>  
> -	struct super_block *sb;
> -	unsigned long nr_pages;
> -	enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode;
> +	struct wb_writeback_args args;
>  
>  	unsigned long state;
>  };
> @@ -69,9 +78,11 @@ static inline void bdi_work_init(struct bdi_work *work,
>  				 struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  {
>  	INIT_RCU_HEAD(&work->rcu_head);
> -	work->sb = wbc->sb;
> -	work->nr_pages = wbc->nr_to_write;
> -	work->sync_mode = wbc->sync_mode;
> +	work->args.sb = wbc->sb;
> +	work->args.nr_pages = wbc->nr_to_write;
> +	work->args.sync_mode = wbc->sync_mode;
> +	work->args.range_cyclic = wbc->range_cyclic;
> +	work->args.for_kupdate = 0;
>  	work->state = WS_USED;
>  }
>  
> @@ -106,7 +117,7 @@ static void bdi_work_free(struct rcu_head *head)
>  
>  static void wb_work_complete(struct bdi_work *work)
>  {
> -	const enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode = work->sync_mode;
> +	const enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode = work->args.sync_mode;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * For allocated work, we can clear the done/seen bit right here.
> @@ -653,17 +664,16 @@ static inline bool over_bground_thresh(void)
>   * older_than_this takes precedence over nr_to_write.  So we'll only write back
>   * all dirty pages if they are all attached to "old" mappings.
>   */
> -static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
> -			 struct super_block *sb,
> -			 enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode, int for_kupdate)
> +static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> +			 struct wb_writeback_args *args)
>  {
>  	struct writeback_control wbc = {
>  		.bdi			= wb->bdi,
> -		.sb			= sb,
> -		.sync_mode		= sync_mode,
> +		.sb			= args->sb,
> +		.sync_mode		= args->sync_mode,
>  		.older_than_this	= NULL,
> -		.for_kupdate		= for_kupdate,
> -		.range_cyclic		= 1,
> +		.for_kupdate		= args->for_kupdate,
> +		.range_cyclic		= args->range_cyclic,
>  	};
>  	unsigned long oldest_jif;
>  	long wrote = 0;
> @@ -673,13 +683,18 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
>  		oldest_jif = jiffies -
>  				msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval * 10);
>  	}
> +	if (!wbc.range_cyclic) {
> +		wbc.range_start = 0;
> +		wbc.range_end = LLONG_MAX;
> +	}
>  
>  	for (;;) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Don't flush anything for non-integrity writeback where
>  		 * no nr_pages was given
>  		 */
> -		if (!for_kupdate && nr_pages <= 0 && sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> +		if (!args->for_kupdate && args->nr_pages <= 0 &&
> +		     args->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
>  			break;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -687,7 +702,8 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
>  		 * periodic background writeout and we are below the
>  		 * background dirty threshold, don't do anything
>  		 */
> -		if (for_kupdate && nr_pages <= 0 && !over_bground_thresh())
> +		if (args->for_kupdate && args->nr_pages <= 0 &&
> +		    !over_bground_thresh())
>  			break;
>  
>  		wbc.more_io = 0;
> @@ -695,7 +711,7 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
>  		wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
>  		wbc.pages_skipped = 0;
>  		writeback_inodes_wb(wb, &wbc);
> -		nr_pages -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
> +		args->nr_pages -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
>  		wrote += MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -749,8 +765,16 @@ static long wb_check_old_data_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  			global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
>  			(inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused);
>  
> -	if (nr_pages)
> -		return wb_writeback(wb, nr_pages, NULL, WB_SYNC_NONE, 1);
> +	if (nr_pages) {
> +		struct wb_writeback_args args = {
> +			.nr_pages	= nr_pages,
> +			.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_NONE,
> +			.for_kupdate	= 1,
> +			.range_cyclic	= 1,
> +		};
> +
> +		return wb_writeback(wb, &args);
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -762,35 +786,31 @@ long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, int force_wait)
>  {
>  	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi;
>  	struct bdi_work *work;
> -	long nr_pages, wrote = 0;
> +	long wrote = 0;
>  
>  	while ((work = get_next_work_item(bdi, wb)) != NULL) {
> -		enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode;
> -
> -		nr_pages = work->nr_pages;
> +		struct wb_writeback_args args = work->args;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Override sync mode, in case we must wait for completion
>  		 */
>  		if (force_wait)
> -			work->sync_mode = sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL;
> -		else
> -			sync_mode = work->sync_mode;
> +			work->args.sync_mode = args.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * If this isn't a data integrity operation, just notify
>  		 * that we have seen this work and we are now starting it.
>  		 */
> -		if (sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> +		if (args.sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
>  			wb_clear_pending(wb, work);
>  
> -		wrote += wb_writeback(wb, nr_pages, work->sb, sync_mode, 0);
> +		wrote += wb_writeback(wb, &args);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * This is a data integrity writeback, so only do the
>  		 * notification when we have completed the work.
>  		 */
> -		if (sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> +		if (args.sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
>  			wb_clear_pending(wb, work);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.4.1.207.g68ea
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ