linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes 3/6] ftrace: Fix trace_remove_event_call() to lock trace_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AB0F6B0.8090400@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:31:12 -0400
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To:	rostedt@...dmis.org
CC:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
	DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes 3/6] ftrace: Fix trace_remove_event_call()
 to lock trace_event_mutex

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:49 -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> 
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> index 38e82a5..a3d6bad 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> @@ -1055,6 +1055,9 @@ static void remove_subsystem_dir(const char *name)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Must be called under locking both of event_mutex and trace_event_mutex.
>> + */
>>  static void __trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
>>  {
>>  	ftrace_event_enable_disable(call, 0);
>> @@ -1071,7 +1074,9 @@ static void __trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
>>  void trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
> 
> Is this from a previous patch set, because I can't find this in either
> my tree or tip/master.

Right, this bug is from my patch:
tracing: Ftrace dynamic ftrace_event_call support

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/