linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1253112555.3273.164.camel@linux-1lbu>
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:49:14 -0500
From:	Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S

On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 14:30 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com> writes:
> 
> > +config OLD_CPU_DELAY
> > +	depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T
> > +	bool "Accurate delays for some older CPUs"
> > +	def_bool n
> > +	help
> > +	  Try enable this if observing longer than expected delays and need
> > +	  more accuracy.  May cause instability in some CPUs.
> > +
> 
> There is still this uncertain "accurate" in the text. Why don't just
> 
> +	bool "Different delay() code for some older CPUs"

Sounds good.  I also update text under help to better quantify
"accuracy".  Updated patch below.  Separately, as Russel pointed out,
this should only be done by experienced people, so we even bother with
this patch since the only people should touch this are the people who
knows all the details.

Document #if 0 code block in delay.S and make it selectable for compile.

Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com>

---

 arch/arm/Kconfig     |    8 ++++++++
 arch/arm/lib/delay.S |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index aef63c8..ca8d535 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -813,6 +813,14 @@ config ARM_ERRATA_460075
 	  ACTLR register. Note that setting specific bits in the ACTLR
register
 	  may not be available in non-secure mode.
 
+config OLD_CPU_DELAY
+	depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T
+	bool "Different delay() code for some older CPUs"
+	def_bool n
+	help
+	  Try enable this if observing longer than expected delays.  This code
+	  improves accuracy for some CPUs while cause instability in others.
+
 endmenu
 
 source "arch/arm/common/Kconfig"
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/delay.S b/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
index 8d6a876..67e679b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ ENTRY(__const_udelay)				@ 0 <= r0 <= 0x7fffff06
 @ Delay routine
 ENTRY(__delay)
 		subs	r0, r0, #1
-#if 0
+#ifdef CONFIG_OLD_CPU_DELAY
 		movls	pc, lr
 		subs	r0, r0, #1
 		movls	pc, lr


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/