[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AB10F7D.9060706@atmel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:17:01 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
avictor.za@...il.com
CC: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patrice.vilchez@...el.com,
Nicolas FERRE <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] at91/USB: at91sam9g45 series USB host integration
Hi,
I come back on this topic as at91sam9g45 is now in mainline. I need this
integration code to have the USB EHCI work on the evaluation kit.
David Brownell :
> On Friday 19 June 2009, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
>> David Brownell wrote:
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
>>>> + /* Enable VBus control for UHP ports */
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < data->ports; i++) {
>>>> + if (data->vbus_pin[i])
>>>> + at91_set_gpio_output(data->vbus_pin[i], 0);
>>> This should gpio_request() and gpio_direction_output().
>> Hmm...I thought the driver was supposed to call gpio_request(), not the
>> platform code?
>
> In some cases. This isn't a good case for that. Especially
> if it's going to call gpio_direction_output() ... which needs
> gpio_request() to have been done first.
Ok, I am building a patch on top of this one that uses these calls. This
way I can change both vbus pin configuration: OCHI and EHCI.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists