[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0909151954k1061f92dhbc6dcd7a6ccdcdd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:54:17 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/72] Blackfin updates for 2.6.32
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 18:36, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 18:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> this code i had rewritten and as fallout, the style changed. looks
>> fine to me, and no, this particular checpatch "error" is not always
>> worthwhile (like in this case).
>
> Have you read Documentation/CodingStyle ? Can you better explain why
> your don't want to follow that document ? Most people accept that to be
> the style of code in Linux, and that is what checkpatch checks for..
sorry, never heard of Documentation/
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists