[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0909160956m46a59e93ydd19fdbf3fb984f5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:56:08 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blackfin: Cleanup linker script using new linker script
macros.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:58, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> the larger padding in the initramfs is kind of annoying as i cant see
>> any need to pad it to PAGE_SIZE. since the initramfs is released with
>> the rest of the init section, it doesnt need whole pages. a quick
>> test shows that it does waste a few kb in reality. default build for
>> BF533-STAMP for example shows 0x1000 difference.
>
> OK. I guess we should plan to modify the INIT_DATA_SECTION macro to add
> another argument specifying an alignment level for .init.ramfs. It'd be
> inconvenient to add that right now since there are a lot of patches in
> linux-next or otherwise in flight that introduce uses of
> INIT_DATA_SECTION, and those patches would all be broken by changing this
> now. Once the dust settles on that for this release, I'll submit a patch
> adding said argument to INIT_DATA_SECTION.
sounds good to me. too bad the function alignment isnt specified in
arch linkage.h, otherwise i'd suggest we default to that rather than
PAGE_SIZE. as seen in the current Blackfin linker script, we only
need the normal .text alignment of 4 bytes.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists