[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090916044957.GE2756@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:49:57 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: "Song, Barry" <Barry.Song@...log.com>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH] input/keyboard: add ADP5588
QWERTYI2C Keyboard Input device driver
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:25:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 00:18, Song, Barry wrote:
> >From: Mike Frysinger
> >>On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 23:49, Barry Song wrote:
> >>> Even though CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS is almost always "y", in case
> >>> CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS is "n" not "y", threaded_irq will become
> >>> original irq, drivers will not work. So is it necessary to check the
> >>> dependence of GENERIC_HARDIRQS while using threaded_irq?
> >>
> >>when is GENERIC_HARDIRQS not "y" ? a quick check shows only s390/m68k
> >>dont set it to "y" in their arch Kconfig ? s390 isnt going to use any
> >>of these drivers, and m68k will eventually update (m68knommu already
> >>has !?).
> >
> > SPARC32 is "n" too. I am not caring about only these several drivers. I just want to find whether that can be a generic problem while using threaded_irq in any driver.
>
> SPARC32 too is dead, so dont sweat it. it's safe to assume
> GENERIC_HARDIRQS is "y" in the code we write like these input drivers.
I agree here.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists