[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2375c9f90909162359m14ec7640m88ddd7ba54d6e793@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:59:35 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][mmotm] updateing size of kcore
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> After memory hotplug (or other events in future), kcore size
> can be modified.
>
> To update inode->i_size, we have to know inode/dentry but we
> can't get it from inside /proc directly.
> But considerinyg memory hotplug, kcore image is updated only when
> it's opened. Then, updating inode->i_size at open() is enough.
>
> Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
This patch looks fine.
However, I am thinking if kcore is the only file under /proc whose size
is changed dynamically? If no, that probably means we need to change
generic proc code.
Thanks!
> ---
> fs/proc/kcore.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> Index: mmotm-2.6.31-Sep14/fs/proc/kcore.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.31-Sep14.orig/fs/proc/kcore.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.31-Sep14/fs/proc/kcore.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,11 @@ static int open_kcore(struct inode *inod
> return -EPERM;
> if (kcore_need_update)
> kcore_update_ram();
> + if (i_size_read(inode) != proc_root_kcore->size) {
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + i_size_write(inode, proc_root_kcore->size);
> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists