| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-b438d34496c3c9fddc46012359e3bb2cf4df901e@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:54:49 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Add new wakeup preemption mode: WAKEUP_RUNNING, disable FAIR_SLEEPERS
Commit-ID: b438d34496c3c9fddc46012359e3bb2cf4df901e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b438d34496c3c9fddc46012359e3bb2cf4df901e
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:31:31 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:51:48 +0200
sched: Add new wakeup preemption mode: WAKEUP_RUNNING, disable FAIR_SLEEPERS
Create a new wakeup preemption mode, preempt towards tasks that run
shorter on avg. It sets next buddy to be sure we actually run the task
we preempted for.
Also turn off FAIR_SLEEPERS - this new mechanism replaces it.
Test results:
root@...ns:~# while :; do :; done &
[1] 6537
root@...ns:~# while :; do :; done &
[2] 6538
root@...ns:~# while :; do :; done &
[3] 6539
root@...ns:~# while :; do :; done &
[4] 6540
root@...ns:/home/peter# ./latt -c4 sleep 4
Entries: 48 (clients=4)
Averages:
------------------------------
Max 4750 usec
Avg 497 usec
Stdev 737 usec
root@...ns:/home/peter# echo WAKEUP_RUNNING > /debug/sched_features
root@...ns:/home/peter# ./latt -c4 sleep 4
Entries: 48 (clients=4)
Averages:
------------------------------
Max 14 usec
Avg 5 usec
Stdev 3 usec
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 ++
kernel/sched.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
kernel/sched_debug.c | 1 +
kernel/sched_fair.c | 14 +++++++++++---
kernel/sched_features.h | 7 ++++++-
5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b4a39bb..8af3d24 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1113,6 +1113,8 @@ struct sched_entity {
u64 start_runtime;
u64 avg_wakeup;
+ u64 avg_running;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
u64 wait_start;
u64 wait_max;
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 969dfae..3bb4ea2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2458,6 +2458,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
p->se.avg_overlap = 0;
p->se.start_runtime = 0;
p->se.avg_wakeup = sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity;
+ p->se.avg_running = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
p->se.wait_start = 0;
@@ -5310,14 +5311,13 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev)
#endif
}
-static void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
+static void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (prev->state == TASK_RUNNING) {
- u64 runtime = prev->se.sum_exec_runtime;
+ u64 runtime = p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime;
- runtime -= prev->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime;
- runtime = min_t(u64, runtime, 2*sysctl_sched_migration_cost);
+ update_avg(&p->se.avg_running, runtime);
+ if (p->state == TASK_RUNNING) {
/*
* In order to avoid avg_overlap growing stale when we are
* indeed overlapping and hence not getting put to sleep, grow
@@ -5327,9 +5327,12 @@ static void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
* correlates to the amount of cache footprint a task can
* build up.
*/
- update_avg(&prev->se.avg_overlap, runtime);
+ runtime = min_t(u64, runtime, 2*sysctl_sched_migration_cost);
+ update_avg(&p->se.avg_overlap, runtime);
+ } else {
+ update_avg(&p->se.avg_running, 0);
}
- prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+ p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p);
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
index 5ddbd08..efb8440 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
PN(se.sum_exec_runtime);
PN(se.avg_overlap);
PN(se.avg_wakeup);
+ PN(se.avg_running);
nr_switches = p->nvcsw + p->nivcsw;
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index c741cd9..3e6f78c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1605,9 +1605,6 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
return;
}
- if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
- return;
-
if ((sched_feat(WAKEUP_SYNC) && sync) ||
(sched_feat(WAKEUP_OVERLAP) &&
(se->avg_overlap < sysctl_sched_migration_cost &&
@@ -1616,6 +1613,17 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
return;
}
+ if (sched_feat(WAKEUP_RUNNING)) {
+ if (pse->avg_running < se->avg_running) {
+ set_next_buddy(pse);
+ resched_task(curr);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
+ return;
+
find_matching_se(&se, &pse);
BUG_ON(!pse);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_features.h b/kernel/sched_features.h
index d5059fd..929308c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched_features.h
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
* considers the task to be running during that period. This gives it
* a service deficit on wakeup, allowing it to run sooner.
*/
-SCHED_FEAT(FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
+SCHED_FEAT(FAIR_SLEEPERS, 0)
/*
* Only give sleepers 50% of their service deficit. This allows
@@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_SYNC, 0)
SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_OVERLAP, 0)
/*
+ * Wakeup preemption towards tasks that run short
+ */
+SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_RUNNING, 1)
+
+/*
* Use the SYNC wakeup hint, pipes and the likes use this to indicate
* the remote end is likely to consume the data we just wrote, and
* therefore has cache benefit from being placed on the same cpu, see
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists