linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the blackfin tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090917112604.acbae122.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:26:04 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the blackfin tree with Linus' tree

Hi Mike,

Today's linux-next merge of the blackfin tree got a conflict in
arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c between commit
b9bf3121af348d9255f1c917830fe8c2df52efcb ("percpu: use
DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED()") from Linus' tree and commit
40bf94d6d1158fb6d6d67a666e6b16ab6ac3986e ("Blackfin: push SRAM locks down
into related ifdefs") from the blackfin tree.

The latter moved the code that the former modified.  I fixed it up (see
below) and can carry the fix for a while.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c
index 99e4dbb,e095094..0000000
--- a/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c
@@@ -55,6 -50,7 +50,7 @@@ struct sram_piece 
  	struct sram_piece *next;
  };
  
 -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
++static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1sram_lock);
  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, free_l1_ssram_head);
  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, used_l1_ssram_head);
  
@@@ -68,7 -64,12 +64,12 @@@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece
  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, used_l1_data_B_sram_head);
  #endif
  
+ #if L1_DATA_A_LENGTH || L1_DATA_B_LENGTH
 -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1_data_sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
++static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1_data_sram_lock);
+ #endif
+ 
  #if L1_CODE_LENGTH != 0
 -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1_inst_sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
++static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1_inst_sram_lock);
  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, free_l1_inst_sram_head);
  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, used_l1_inst_sram_head);
  #endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/