[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090917193543.5f88e2b1@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:35:43 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
alan@...ux.intel.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: fanotify as syscalls
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> And then we have page faults. I've long wished that from a system
> call tracing standpoint we could show page faults as
> pseudo-system-calls (at least as long as they happen from user space
> - trying to handle nesting is not worth it). It would make it _so_
> much more obvious what the performance patterns are if you could just
> do
>
> strace -ttT firefox
>
> for the cold-cache case and you'd see where the time is really spent.
>
> (yeah, yeah, you can get that kind of information other ways, but
> it's a hell of a lot less convenient than just getting a nice trace
> with timestamps).
ohhh I should add pagefaults to timechart
good one.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists