lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:02:49 +0200
From:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [stable] [patch 00/48] 2.6.27.32-stable review

Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> [On holiday, answering from my nominally internet capable cellphone - please make allowances ...]
>>
>> The stable patch claiming to correspond to Linus' tree patch
>> 56f7efe48d57dda9e59e23ab161c118271cce815 and merged in 2.6.27.sth
>> (eyact version not at hand) and 2.6.28.10 differs from the backported
>> patch I submitted for stable myself. It breaks the driver completely,
>> causing an oops and system malfunctions as soon as the device is
>> connected. (Sorry for not noticing the vital difference at the time.)
> 
> No problem.
> 
>> The attached patch would fix the error by moving the code inswrted at
>> the wrong place by the broken backported patch,, to the correct place
>> where it went in the original patch. 
> 
> I see no patch attached here :(
> 
>> Alternativelyy, the broken backported could be reverted and my
>> original bacport merged instead, if you can still find it.
> 
> I can not.
> 
>> Sorry for lack of references as i don't have acces to my development
>> machine from here. Hope to have Cleared up the situation, anyway.
> 
> Can you send me what you need applied to the latest 2.6.27-stable tree
> to fix this up so we can finally resolve this?
> 

I believe it was applicable to 2.6.27.y without problems. This is the patch I 
sent to Tilman and stable. (Sorry, I am currently at the airport and do not 
have 2.6.27.y with me)

-Stefan

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stable-review mailing list
> Stable-review@...ux.kernel.org
> http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable-review


View attachment "0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-Fix-incorrect-stable-backport-to-bas_.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (1951 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ